Showing posts with label Community Planning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Community Planning. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

January 2014 ENGAGE Recap

Guest post from 2013-14 ENGAGE Breakfast Series guest blogger Alicia Dietrich. Alicia is a public affairs representative at the Harry Ransom Center at The University of Texas at Austin. See the end of this post for the podcast from the breakfast.
-----

The January installment of Leadership Austin’s ENGAGE breakfast series explored the best ways for leaders to move Austin forward during this period of tremendous growth and change. Panelists Travis County Judge Sam Biscoe and University of Texas at Austin Professor Jeremi Suri sat down with moderator Shannon Wolfson of KXAN to discuss the challenges Austin faces as it grows, and what it will take for leaders to address those issues.

Suri outlined what he believes to be the three greatest leadership challenges facing Austin: the challenge of success and how to lead beyond that, diverse groups in Austin not living in integrated ways, and the uneven growth of the economy and lack of opportunities for upward mobility.

January 2014 ENGAGE breakfast at the Long Center

To address Austin’s greatest challenges, Biscoe advocated for better collaboration between the city, government agencies, nonprofits, and community leaders. He noted the improved state of mental health care in the city after local hospitals worked with the county jail to make sure that patients were getting appropriate treatment instead of jail time.

However, he said that while the city has high aspirations for cooperation, we often fall short on implementation.

"We've always done a good job of studying and putting together reports and plans," he said. It's the next step that’s key, though.

He explained that government tends to respond to issues and problems, and if you have a problem you want solved, you need to get it in front of the right person and work to build consensus.

"We respond, by and large, to specific issues that we try to fix," he said. "I don’t know if we as a county ever sit down and think, 'What kind of Travis County do we want?'"

He noted that building consensus and compromise are crucial: "If you have five persons responsible for a decision, you'll see that often what we approve wasn't what was brought to us. But you'll see what got consensus and what we had resources to back up."

KXAN's Kate Weidaw interviews
panelist Judge Sam Biscoe
Suri noted that it was important that people learn that compromise is necessary and that they shouldn’t feel shut out of the process if they don’t get everything they want. "When people come to believe it's a process where the decision of today isn't the last decision—if they only got 20 percent of what they wanted today, maybe tomorrow they'll get something more. When it's a process and you have credibility, that's what works."

Suri also discussed the importance of crossing lines in politics to get things done. "We need to talk to people who think differently and see things differently. We need to make a conscious effort to cross lines because you can't [create change] if you're only talking to people who already agree with you. You need to make a conscious effort to cross lines, and the beauty of Austin is that we have such an intellectual diversity here all around us."

As Austin moves toward a new City Council structure next year with single-member districts, both panelists stressed the importance of asking tough questions of potential leaders to make sure they can articulate a vision for the city’s future and how they will include everyone in that vision.

"As an elected official, your attitude should be 'I represent all county residents,'" said Biscoe. "From the neighborhood association level on up, inclusion should be part of everything we do. If we err, it should be that we included too many people."

Suri said, "We desperately need people in this city now who can continue to talk to groups who have been dominating dialog but are also able to bring other people in and connect them. Successful politicians are connectors. Second, I think it’s time we ask our politicians to say not just what they promise to do about a problem, but what they envision the city looking like. I think we do need a vision. I don’t mean a visionary in terms of pie in the sky, but an ability to articulate, to tell us a story about how you see our city with all these changes, institutionally and economically, growing in the next five to 10 years and how we can all be part of making that kind of city."

Both panelists also emphasized the importance of mentoring and incubating future leaders, through encouraging students to pursue public service and by implementing permanent succession strategies at the government level.

"We need to remind people at all age levels, but particularly young people, that public service is a noble calling," said Suri. "Leadership has to involve politics in your organization and in your city."

Full Audio from the Event


Download this audio file (MP3)

Friday, December 20, 2013

December 2013 ENGAGE Recap

Guest post from 2013-14 ENGAGE Breakfast Series guest blogger Alicia Dietrich. Alicia is a public affairs representative at the Harry Ransom Center at The University of Texas at Austin. See the end of this post for the podcast from the breakfast.
-----

As panelists gathered for the December installment of Leadership Austin’s ENGAGE breakfast series, everyone agreed that the issue of affordability in Austin is complicated and all but impossible to solve in the short-term.

Panelists Brian Kelsey (Civic Analytics), Frances Ferguson (HousingWorks Austin), and Chris Bradford (Land Development Code Advisory Group) discussed ways that Austin can work to keep the city affordable amid very rapid growth that shows no signs of slowing down. The discussion was moderated by KXAN anchor Robert Hadlock.


Kelsey pointed out that Austin is a much wealthier city than it was 12 years ago. In 2000, one in seven households had an income of $100,000 or more. Today, it’s one in four, and that statistic is a reflection of the fundamental demographic changes that are happening in a city that's gaining 60,000 residents a year.

"We constantly need to figure out—with land economics going this way, which tends to really throw up housing costs—how we keep both the low end and the low-middle end served in our housing stock," said Ferguson. "And that’s going to take some very creative policies."

Panelists discussed multiple ways to address housing affordability, including facilitating new construction, preserving existing housing stock, using creative loan programs to create and sustain an affordable stock of homes, raising wages, and improving education and workforce training for high-wage jobs.

But probably the most effective solution is one of the most tedious and complicated pieces of the puzzle: the re-write of the Land Development Code in Austin.


CodeNEXT is an initiative to revise the Land Development Code, which determines how land can be used throughout the city—including what can be built, where it can be built, and how much can (and cannot) be built. The process is a collaboration between Austin's residents, business community, and civic institutions to align land use standards and regulations with what is important to the community.

Bradford noted that the housing stock in Austin must increase to meet rising demand as 150 people move here each day who need a place to live. However, the current code in Austin was written 30 years ago and has been amended many, many times since to become a complicated document that severely restricts the types of housing that can be built in the city.

Notice how many enormous new apartment complexes are going up on Lamar and Congress and Burnet? Bradford pointed out that the code is written in such a way that these are often the only types of projects allowed for those areas. The current code makes it very difficult to build all types of housing for all types of people needed in a city with diverse incomes and needs.

"There's no breathing room to build small, multi-family buildings," said Bradford. "It’s very difficult—unnecessarily difficult—to even build things like garage apartments in central neighborhoods. One of the things we should be focusing on is making it easier to build small infill projects: garage apartments, making it easier to build duplexes, making it easier to build small multifamily buildings, to build four-plexes or six-plexes. Those can be added all over the place and provide a kind of invisible density that will be an important source of new supply."

Bradford and Ferguson both also advocated for policies that preserve existing multifamily properties. Housing units built in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s are a lot more expensive in Austin than in Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio. While that should be where affordable housing exists, demand is high enough to keep prices high.

As part of HousingWorks Austin, Ferguson has worked on projects that create affordable housing in central neighborhoods through shared appreciation programs. Homeowners who buy an affordable home can't just flip it to sell it at market value and pocket the profit, and this approach allows a stock of affordable homes to stay in the market through multiple sales in the future.

She pointed to the Mueller redevelopment as a great example of this type of housing, and she encourages all city leaders and policy makers to take tours of these homes that are integrated into central neighborhoods.

Mueller Illustrative Plan (click here for a larger version)

"When people see the solutions that Austin has, they change their mind," said Ferguson. "Because the picture that they have in their mind is something they built in the '70s. And the solutions Austin has are remarkable, are effective, are well-managed, and when they see that, the other thing they understand is that they can put this kind of housing in every part of town and not have a problem at all. In fact, it becomes an asset in their communities in terms of being able to have a mix of homes to serve their workforce. And the third thing they begin to understand is this notion of all kinds of homes in all parts of town."

But beyond finding ways to lower housing costs, Kelsey pointed out the need to address ways to increase wages for residents. He advocated raising the minimum wage and noted that improving schools goes beyond more funding.

"We need a different mindset in how we educate and train future workers," said Kelsey. "I would like to see a different conversation about the role of career and technical education to prepare people for high-wage job opportunities here. We need to figure out ways to make education and workforce training work better for more of our residents."

Though the panelists approach the issue of affordability through different lenses and with different solutions, all agree that the housing issue must be addressed now if the city wants to maintain its character.

"Housing is the only way you have an integrated city," said Ferguson. "It is the only way. Busing people around is not an integrated and diverse city."

Full Audio from the Event


Download this audio file (MP3)

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Austin's Affordability Conundrum

Guest blogger Paul Hilgers (ESSENTIAL 1987) with a look at affordability in advance of Leadership Austin's December 18 ENGAGE breakfast on the same topic. Paul is CEO at the Austin Board of REALTORS®.
-----

It's an exciting time to live in Austin. Our economy and our housing market are stronger than ever, fueled by new jobs and new residents... 150 people each day, according to the Austin Chamber of Commerce. However, every rose has its thorns and, for Austin, that thorn has become decreasing housing affordability requiring decisive and positive action.

Austin is quickly becoming one of the most expensive housing markets in Texas. If that trend continues, there will be much less opportunity of homeownership for Austinites who fill our workforce needs and maintain the diversity of our city. One key factor in responding to this challenge is the impending overhaul of the City of Austin's Land Development Code. We must tackle that challenge in a way that fits with Austin's vision and makes development more practical and less costly.

Currently, Austin's Land Development Code is a complicated set of rules and regulations that are notoriously difficult to navigate and interpreted inconsistently. As a result, the LDC creates uncertainty in the development process and takes significantly more time and fees to build a new home in Austin than it does in other Texas cities. In theory, that is intended to prevent development that falls outside of the city’s growth plan. In practice, the inefficiencies of the code work to unnecessarily delay development that is good for communities and cause the cost of homeownership to rise.

The Austin Board of REALTORS® advocates for a development process that is efficient, consistent and does not pose ineffective barriers to healthy and controlled growth. The code should be condensed to have less negotiated solutions to individual problems and more consistent application of agreed upon planning principles. With a more streamlined product, the Planning, Development and Review Department will be more efficient and thus able to expedite their review of applications and bring down the overall cost of development.

In addition, the new Land Development Code should have a framework that is supported by our community and designed to meet its future needs, protecting the credibility of Austin's neighborhoods and encouraging density where it's needed to create a more balanced housing market.

That approach is clearly outlined by the Imagine Austin plan, which puts forth a vision of Austin that is more compact and connected. Policymakers agree that Austin must begin changing development patterns now in order to make progress toward the goals of Imagine Austin over the next several years.

As a stakeholder in the revision of the City's Land Development Code, the Austin Board of REALTORS® will be engaged in the process, and I encourage you to do the same by getting involved with the City's CodeNext initiative. Let’s ensure that Austin remains a place that residents of all types can call home.

-----
NOTE: The opinions of Leadership Austin alumni, faculty members, and guest bloggers are their own, and do not represent an official position of the organization.

Friday, June 7, 2013

June 2013 ENGAGE Wrap-Up

This month's ENGAGE breakfast looked at transportation, mobility, and solutions to our region’s growing traffic congestion issues. We learned that as the 11th largest city in the country, Austin has already seen an 8% increase in congestion in just the first quarter of 2013; and if nothing changes, the average commute time for Austin motorists could be 190 minutes by the year 2035.

Panelists discussed new transit options coming in 2014, the use of tolls to pay for needed expansion of roadways, collaboration between transportation agencies to create a regional plan, and changing the behaviors of Central Texas residents that will lead to less cars on the road. Speakers included Mario Espinoza (Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority), Glenn Gadbois (Movability Austin), and Linda Watson (Capital Metro). The panel was moderated by Brian Sanders of KXAN-TV.

June 2013 ENGAGE Panelists

Below is the full podcast of the event, along with links to media coverage and resources from the discussion.

Audio Podcast



As this was the final breakfast of our 2012-13 ENGAGE series, we'd like to once again recognize our generous sponsors for their continued support. Special thanks to presenting sponsor Capital One Bank for their fourth consecutive year of leadership on the ENGAGE Breakfast Series!

We'll be back with a new season of ENGAGE starting October 2013. In the meantime, continue the discussion on what we've covered this year - or send us your ideas for topics to consider in the future - via the blog comments, Facebook, or Twitter. And don't forget to check our calendar for upcoming Leadership Austin events this summer.

Friday, May 31, 2013

If We Can Only Get There: Focus the transportation conversation on peak hour congestion

Guest post from Real Estate Council of Austin (RECA) board member Tom Terkel.
-----

We are blessed to live in one of the most exciting cities in the world. Austin is changing daily, offering all of us ever more opportunities to work, learn, connect, grow and prosper - it is there for the taking for each of us.

If we can only get there. I mean literally. If only we can physically move from one place to another. Our traffic congestion threatens the quality of life we hold so dear as Austinites. When we have to leave at 4:30 to get to a 6:00 lecture at UT, we won’t be so blissful about our great city. And if we don’t continue to focus on creating alternatives for mobility, that dire prediction will become reality. If we wanted to live in Los Angeles, we’d move right?

I am so glad Leadership Austin will be discussing mobility solutions in June, because we need our region’s best and brightest thinking about this problem, and we need you to keep it at the forefront of our public conversation.

Let’s start by defining the problem. Is it moving around at 10:30 in the morning or at 2:30 in the afternoon? Not so much. The true mobility challenges occur in the morning and afternoon rush hours. Peak hour congestion is what the transportation experts call it.

There are many well-intentioned people who offer transportation solutions to problems other than peak hour congestion. If the problem we’re solving is obesity, then sure, a logical policy solution is encouraging walking on trails or riding bikes. And, building Great Streets-style sidewalks and safer biking lanes are great ideas, but they don’t materially contribute to alleviating peak hour congestion.

We need to focus on peak hour traffic congestion as the preeminent problem to be addressed by our transportation policies, priorities, and spending allocations. When we do that, our conversation changes. We start with a blank slate, and then we would:

  • Use existing data about where people live and where they work to create an accurate picture of where people are moving from and to at peak hours of congestion throughout the Austin region. We have to remember Austin’s economy depends on the regional communities that surround us too.
  • Use the data described above to prioritize congested corridors for policy and spending focus. What solutions could be utilized to alter the current road or create an alternative to the route currently utilized? How can mass transit contribute to alleviating peak hour congestion?
  • Analyze the costs associated with potential mobility solutions and describe the return on investment in terms of congestion relief before making decisions about how to spend taxpayer dollars.
Maybe urban rail is the best solution and the highest priority; if so, it will become obvious. Maybe another mode or another route or another corridor is the best solution and the highest priority. Only one way to know.

What our city needs for the residents here today - as well as those who are moving here - is an honest process without a pre-ordained outcome that is oriented around solving peak-hour vehicular congestion, and an open-mindedness to what those solutions may be.

Tom Terkel is Founder and Principal of Four T Realty and is a member of the Real Estate Council of Austin's Board of Directors.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Dialogue About Regional Mobility Ramps Up

Guest post from Capital Metro President/CEO and June 4 ENGAGE breakfast panelist Linda Watson.
-----

Nearly every week, I see a new report or news article that adds to the community dialogue surrounding transportation and transportation infrastructure in our region.

CultureMap Austin recently reported new Census Bureau stats that paint the picture of Central Texas’ rapid growth and the ramifications for our mobility. Austin is now the 11th largest U.S. city, and we experienced the fourth largest jump in population from 2011 to 2012.

What was most demonstrative to me of our mobility challenges was the growth occurring outside Austin proper. San Marcos was the fastest growing city in the nation for its size. Cedar Park and Georgetown also made the top ten.

A Regional Problem
Those stats really underscore the fact that our traffic problems are regional in nature. Nearly 30 percent of all jobs in the region are located within four central Austin zip codes, so while many people are moving into the communities north, south and east of Austin, they still have to travel to Austin for work. You only need to drive on IH 35 during commute hours to see the scope of the transportation challenges we face.

In fact, an Austin economist has predicted that we only have about five or six more years to do something about our traffic problems before companies start to pull out of our area and relocate elsewhere. In other words, if we don’t address the mobility challenges, traffic woes could eventually derail our economic prosperity.

Regional Momentum for Solutions
With that great sense of urgency, the good news is that now, more than ever before, transportation agencies are pulling together to develop regional mobility solutions. And, after nearly three years of hard work improving nearly every aspect of our business, Capital Metro has never been in a better position to lead the effort.


Increasingly, the public is ready to embrace transit, too. Ridership on Capital Metro outpaced the national trend in 2012, and we saw an additional one million boardings over 2011. MetroRail ridership has tripled since service began and is standing room only every day during rush hour.

Capital Metro, the City of Austin, CAMPO and Lone Star Rail, with guidance from Mayor Lee Leffingwell and members of the Transit Working Group, have collaborated to develop a transportation vision for the region. The collaboration, called Project Connect, focuses on high-capacity transit options for the region that will move more people for less cost and with less impact on the environment.

The vision includes Express lanes on Mopac (coming 2015), MetroRapid service (early 2014), expanded MetroRail service, Lone Star rail service from San Antonio to Georgetown, and urban rail within central Austin.

View the hi-res version of this map

Capital Metro and the City of Austin have hired urban rail expert Kyle Keahey to lead the effort to develop an urban rail plan and bring it to a public vote next year.

A separate Project Connect study is evaluating traffic solutions within the North Corridor, encompassing downtown Austin and the communities of Hutto, Pflugerville, Round Rock and Georgetown.

Public Involvement is Key
Public feedback and involvement is paramount to the design and development of all of these solutions as outlined in the vision. The Project Connect partners have committed to a process that incorporates meaningful and robust dialogue with the community. Look for upcoming opportunities to discuss Project Connect, urban rail and the North Corridor this summer and fall.

Transportation is the topic of the next Leadership Austin ENGAGE breakfast on June 4. Get involved and help shape the solutions that will keep our region livable, healthy and moving.

Since 2010, Linda Watson has been president/CEO of Capital Metro, where she has led the organization in a complete turnaround that has resulted in financial stability and transparency, greater accountability and increased transit ridership.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

May 2013 ENGAGE Wrap-Up

This month's ENGAGE breakfast looked at housing supply, demand and affordability in Austin and Central Texas. Panelists discussed the challenges of keeping up with a quickly growing city, the unnecessary costs of development, the need for programs that provide housing options the market doesn't supply, Austin's Land Development Code, and much more. Speakers included Pete Dwyer (Dwyer Realty Companies), Frank Fernandez (Green Doors), and Paul Hilgers (Austin Board of REALTORS). The panel was moderated by Leslie Rhode of KXAN-TV.

May 2013 ENGAGE Breakfast at the Long Center

Below is the full podcast of the event, along with links to media coverage and resources from the discussion.

Audio Podcast


Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Opposing Central Health's Proposition 1: CultureMap Editorial Series Continued

Leadership Austin is partnering with CultureMap Austin on a series of editorial columns meant to inform Austinites about the upcoming City of Austin proposition elections, to be held November 6.

Today's column is from invited guest columnist Roger Falk on Proposition 1 and a proposed medical school for the city. Head over to CultureMap to read the full post.

The case against the UT medical school: Central Health's Proposition 1

NOTE: The opinions of Leadership Austin alumni and faculty members are their own, and do not represent an official position of the organization.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

In Favor of Central Health's Proposition 1: CultureMap Editorial Series Continued

Leadership Austin is partnering with CultureMap Austin on a series of editorial columns meant to inform Austinites about the upcoming City of Austin proposition elections, to be held November 6.

Today's column is from former City of Austin Mayor Pro Tem Betty Durkerley on Proposition 1 and a proposed medical school for the city. Head over to CultureMap to read the full post. Betty Dunkerley was a panelist at the October 10 ENGAGE Breakfast Town Hall event.

UT needs a medical school: The case for Central Health's Proposition 1

NOTE: The opinions of Leadership Austin alumni and faculty members are their own, and do not represent an official position of the organization.

Friday, November 4, 2011

October 2011 Essential Class - A Crash Course in Austin's Plan

Guest post from Essential Class of 2012 participant Monica M. Williams. The October 2011 class day theme was "Demographics and Growth: Creating a Baseline."
-----

Our first Essential Class day hit me in the middle of the busiest week of the year for the Austin Community Foundation, where I'm Communications Director. But considering the content of that day, maybe the fact that I was already running at a breakneck pace was for the best.

Because in a way I probably was more prepared for PowerPoint presentations that kept me on the edge of my seat.

Who knew +40 page slide shows could be so riveting? And yet the presentations from Ryan Robinson and Jon Roberts were just that.

Robinson, the City of Austin's demographer, also happens to be a born-and-raised Austinite. His presentation of the top-ten demographic trends in Austin showed that he loves the city and he loves his work. Roberts, an economist, used his expertise to help us connect the dots, too. His presentation about the future of Austin's economy was no less than thrilling - and I hated economics in college. Together, it was a one-two punch of some pretty heavy stuff.

So first we got the city's data, then we got the city's plan.

In the afternoon, we heard from Imagine Austin about the city's comprehensive plan. There were some disconnects and lots of questions. Overall the effect of the day's presentations was a little like Charlie's tour of the chocolate factory.

Based on the information I have now, I have come to a few conclusions that are probably premature, uninformed and way too simple. (Maybe I'm taking this too personally?) Here they are:
  1. The way we talk about racial inequality in Austin needs to change. In the nonprofit sector, where I work, we talk about diversity. Clearly, according to Robinson's presentation, we are a diverse city.

    It's time for us to talk about integration.

    Now I for one hate both of those words. They sound archaic and forced, corporate and nebulous. In my gut it feels like we're all at the eighth-grade dance and no one wants to be the first to make a move.

    But I'm a Mexican-American who's used to being one of the few - if not the only - Hispanic at every job I've ever had. Trust me, it's only as scary as we make it. In about 15 years, we're all going to have Hispanics in our family (by marriage) anyway, so it will be less of an issue. In the meantime, let's dance!

  2. What's good for the Austin economy ignores the population that's growing the fastest in Austin: poor Hispanics.

    Roberts described a steep decline in manufacturing jobs across the country and how Austin's economic growth has been tied to its ability to create an "ecosystem for innovation." He concluded that Austin's growth opportunities for the next decade include international tourism, a medical school and more corporate headquarters.

    But Robinson had just told us that the gap between the have and have-nots was increasing. That the fastest-growing population is mostly poor and undereducated Hispanics. Is it the destiny of the city to become a bunch of janitors at hotels catering to F-1 fans and SXSW geeks? (Sorry. I can get overly dramatic.)

  3. Sustainability is the "central policy direction" of the Imagine Austin plan, but I wish that word hadn't been co-opted by environmentalists. Because it's a fitting word, but it implies that we should focus our efforts on the planet over people.

    My impression from the day's information is that most of our policy direction should be in growing Austin's middle class, particularly by providing mentoring, education and training ladders for our growing, young Hispanic population.

    This could resolve many of our current issues, including the racial divide, the economic gaps, and public-education shortcomings. And it's less about "helping the less fortunate" than it is about investing in one of our natural resources - people.
Robinson talked about the new, growing barrios in Austin and how they can either be a toehold for Hispanics to step into middle class or a trap. We already have them in a trap. Are we going to let that happen again?

Monica M. Williams is Communications Director at the Austin Community Foundation and Editor-in-Chief at GivingCity Austin Magazine.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Views from the Seats: October Engage

Feedback from attendees indicates the Oct. 6 Engage Breakfast was quite a success! A panel including Seton Family of Hospitals CEO Jesus Garza, UT President William Powers, and State Senator Kirk Watson addressed "ATXpansion: Central Texas Grows toward the Future."

Live polling took place throughout the event. By texting and tweeting responses, attendees helped to guide the discussion towards topics most relevant and pressing in our community. The results of the live polling are in our previous post.

The panelists discussed a variety of expansion-related issues -- from transportation, education and water conservation to healthcare and the establishment of a medical school in Austin. Here are few highlights of their comments:

Traffic and Transportation
The live audience poll indicated traffic and transportation is our region's top growth concern. Senator Kirk Watson agreed with the audience, saying that limited planning tools and a lack of sufficient funding are key issues. Said Watson, "You can’t vote 47% that transportation is your biggest problem, and then vote 47% that you don’t want to pay for it."

Medical School
Audience polling indicated that economic growth was the top benefit of creating a Medical School in Austin within 10 years. Jesus Garza stressed that beyond providing education for young medical students and residents and addressing a shortage in physicians, establishing a medical school would “be a great opportunity for us to really build the next economic equation for this region."

Bill Powers agreed, and pointed to the advantage of Austin already having the "underlying science and education" part of the necessary infrastructure. "All the elements are there," Powers said. "Biomedical engineering, chemistry and biochemistry, nursing, pharmacy, social work."

Each panelist concluded with a call to urging that in all areas of future growth, we should remember the importance of:
  • Building infrastructure for the next generation
  • Getting rid of “the fear factor” in order to encourage investment
  • Getting involved by becoming an expert in one’s passion
  • Approaching issues with pragmatism rather than political agenda

Popular Austin speaker and consultant Thom Singer was in the audience, and offers additional views and commentary on his blog, Some Assembly Required.

News Coverage
Be sure to visit the news coverage on our partner pages at Community Impact, and also click below to watch the coverage on KXAN. The Statesman also covered the story from the medical school perspective.

Friday, November 12, 2010

fastforward 2010 - Session III: The New Regionalism

Moderator Jon Roberts (TIP Strategies, Inc.) led the distinguished panel - Tom Mason (LCRA), Charles Heimsath (Capitol Market Research), Todd Hemingson (Capital Metro), Sean Compton (Congress for the New Urbanism), Jesus Garza (Seton Family of Hospitals), and Bill Glavin (TxDOT) - in an interesting look at regional planning issues that confront Central Texas governments, agencies, businesses, and non-profits as all emerge from the economic recession.

Session III Moderator John Roberts

Especially pertinent were discussions of ways to accomodate physical growth (both in terms of population and land consumption) in smart, enivronmentally sustainable, and socially equitable ways by making wise public and private investment in infrastructure and indeed all of the built environment.

References from the discussion:

Audio:
  • Part 1 of 2: Tom Mason, Charles Heimsath, Todd Hemingson, and Sean Compton
  • Part 2 of 2: Jesus Garza, Bill Glavin, and Q&A
Download these audio files: Part 1 | Part 2

Live polling results:



Tuesday, October 6, 2009

October 2009 Engage - Infrastructure and Community Planning

In the regional planning spotlights are several far-reaching plans for Austin and Central Texas: CAMPO’s 2035 Growth Concept, the City of Austin’s Comprehensive Plan, and several others. As we plan for a sustainable, vibrant and cohesive future, how do these plans fit together and what will they mean for the region as a whole?

Stevie Greathouse and Garner Stoll

Speakers:
  • Stevie Greathouse – Principal Planner, Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO)
  • Garner Stoll – Assistant Director, City of Austin Planning and Development Review Department
  • Moderated by Jim Walker – Director of Sustainability, The University of Texas at Austin

References from the discussion:

Audio: