Showing posts with label Transportation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Transportation. Show all posts

Friday, June 7, 2013

June 2013 ENGAGE Wrap-Up

This month's ENGAGE breakfast looked at transportation, mobility, and solutions to our region’s growing traffic congestion issues. We learned that as the 11th largest city in the country, Austin has already seen an 8% increase in congestion in just the first quarter of 2013; and if nothing changes, the average commute time for Austin motorists could be 190 minutes by the year 2035.

Panelists discussed new transit options coming in 2014, the use of tolls to pay for needed expansion of roadways, collaboration between transportation agencies to create a regional plan, and changing the behaviors of Central Texas residents that will lead to less cars on the road. Speakers included Mario Espinoza (Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority), Glenn Gadbois (Movability Austin), and Linda Watson (Capital Metro). The panel was moderated by Brian Sanders of KXAN-TV.

June 2013 ENGAGE Panelists

Below is the full podcast of the event, along with links to media coverage and resources from the discussion.

Audio Podcast



As this was the final breakfast of our 2012-13 ENGAGE series, we'd like to once again recognize our generous sponsors for their continued support. Special thanks to presenting sponsor Capital One Bank for their fourth consecutive year of leadership on the ENGAGE Breakfast Series!

We'll be back with a new season of ENGAGE starting October 2013. In the meantime, continue the discussion on what we've covered this year - or send us your ideas for topics to consider in the future - via the blog comments, Facebook, or Twitter. And don't forget to check our calendar for upcoming Leadership Austin events this summer.

Friday, May 31, 2013

If We Can Only Get There: Focus the transportation conversation on peak hour congestion

Guest post from Real Estate Council of Austin (RECA) board member Tom Terkel.
-----

We are blessed to live in one of the most exciting cities in the world. Austin is changing daily, offering all of us ever more opportunities to work, learn, connect, grow and prosper - it is there for the taking for each of us.

If we can only get there. I mean literally. If only we can physically move from one place to another. Our traffic congestion threatens the quality of life we hold so dear as Austinites. When we have to leave at 4:30 to get to a 6:00 lecture at UT, we won’t be so blissful about our great city. And if we don’t continue to focus on creating alternatives for mobility, that dire prediction will become reality. If we wanted to live in Los Angeles, we’d move right?

I am so glad Leadership Austin will be discussing mobility solutions in June, because we need our region’s best and brightest thinking about this problem, and we need you to keep it at the forefront of our public conversation.

Let’s start by defining the problem. Is it moving around at 10:30 in the morning or at 2:30 in the afternoon? Not so much. The true mobility challenges occur in the morning and afternoon rush hours. Peak hour congestion is what the transportation experts call it.

There are many well-intentioned people who offer transportation solutions to problems other than peak hour congestion. If the problem we’re solving is obesity, then sure, a logical policy solution is encouraging walking on trails or riding bikes. And, building Great Streets-style sidewalks and safer biking lanes are great ideas, but they don’t materially contribute to alleviating peak hour congestion.

We need to focus on peak hour traffic congestion as the preeminent problem to be addressed by our transportation policies, priorities, and spending allocations. When we do that, our conversation changes. We start with a blank slate, and then we would:

  • Use existing data about where people live and where they work to create an accurate picture of where people are moving from and to at peak hours of congestion throughout the Austin region. We have to remember Austin’s economy depends on the regional communities that surround us too.
  • Use the data described above to prioritize congested corridors for policy and spending focus. What solutions could be utilized to alter the current road or create an alternative to the route currently utilized? How can mass transit contribute to alleviating peak hour congestion?
  • Analyze the costs associated with potential mobility solutions and describe the return on investment in terms of congestion relief before making decisions about how to spend taxpayer dollars.
Maybe urban rail is the best solution and the highest priority; if so, it will become obvious. Maybe another mode or another route or another corridor is the best solution and the highest priority. Only one way to know.

What our city needs for the residents here today - as well as those who are moving here - is an honest process without a pre-ordained outcome that is oriented around solving peak-hour vehicular congestion, and an open-mindedness to what those solutions may be.

Tom Terkel is Founder and Principal of Four T Realty and is a member of the Real Estate Council of Austin's Board of Directors.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Dialogue About Regional Mobility Ramps Up

Guest post from Capital Metro President/CEO and June 4 ENGAGE breakfast panelist Linda Watson.
-----

Nearly every week, I see a new report or news article that adds to the community dialogue surrounding transportation and transportation infrastructure in our region.

CultureMap Austin recently reported new Census Bureau stats that paint the picture of Central Texas’ rapid growth and the ramifications for our mobility. Austin is now the 11th largest U.S. city, and we experienced the fourth largest jump in population from 2011 to 2012.

What was most demonstrative to me of our mobility challenges was the growth occurring outside Austin proper. San Marcos was the fastest growing city in the nation for its size. Cedar Park and Georgetown also made the top ten.

A Regional Problem
Those stats really underscore the fact that our traffic problems are regional in nature. Nearly 30 percent of all jobs in the region are located within four central Austin zip codes, so while many people are moving into the communities north, south and east of Austin, they still have to travel to Austin for work. You only need to drive on IH 35 during commute hours to see the scope of the transportation challenges we face.

In fact, an Austin economist has predicted that we only have about five or six more years to do something about our traffic problems before companies start to pull out of our area and relocate elsewhere. In other words, if we don’t address the mobility challenges, traffic woes could eventually derail our economic prosperity.

Regional Momentum for Solutions
With that great sense of urgency, the good news is that now, more than ever before, transportation agencies are pulling together to develop regional mobility solutions. And, after nearly three years of hard work improving nearly every aspect of our business, Capital Metro has never been in a better position to lead the effort.


Increasingly, the public is ready to embrace transit, too. Ridership on Capital Metro outpaced the national trend in 2012, and we saw an additional one million boardings over 2011. MetroRail ridership has tripled since service began and is standing room only every day during rush hour.

Capital Metro, the City of Austin, CAMPO and Lone Star Rail, with guidance from Mayor Lee Leffingwell and members of the Transit Working Group, have collaborated to develop a transportation vision for the region. The collaboration, called Project Connect, focuses on high-capacity transit options for the region that will move more people for less cost and with less impact on the environment.

The vision includes Express lanes on Mopac (coming 2015), MetroRapid service (early 2014), expanded MetroRail service, Lone Star rail service from San Antonio to Georgetown, and urban rail within central Austin.

View the hi-res version of this map

Capital Metro and the City of Austin have hired urban rail expert Kyle Keahey to lead the effort to develop an urban rail plan and bring it to a public vote next year.

A separate Project Connect study is evaluating traffic solutions within the North Corridor, encompassing downtown Austin and the communities of Hutto, Pflugerville, Round Rock and Georgetown.

Public Involvement is Key
Public feedback and involvement is paramount to the design and development of all of these solutions as outlined in the vision. The Project Connect partners have committed to a process that incorporates meaningful and robust dialogue with the community. Look for upcoming opportunities to discuss Project Connect, urban rail and the North Corridor this summer and fall.

Transportation is the topic of the next Leadership Austin ENGAGE breakfast on June 4. Get involved and help shape the solutions that will keep our region livable, healthy and moving.

Since 2010, Linda Watson has been president/CEO of Capital Metro, where she has led the organization in a complete turnaround that has resulted in financial stability and transparency, greater accountability and increased transit ridership.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

January ESSENTIAL Class Day Takeaways

Guest post from ESSENTIAL Class of 2013 participant Laura Donnelly Gonzalez. Laura is Chief Operations Officer at Latinitas, a nonprofit empowering young Latinas through media and technology.
-----

Geeking Out on Public Transportation and Utilities

I probably enjoyed the January class day on public transportation and utilities the most so far in our ESSENTIAL Class of 2013 program year. I felt like most of the presenters had a sensitive and realistic vision for the city and the needs of the people.  There was a balance of visionaries, history, culture and innovators.

Standout moments for me included:

  • The city’s movement towards "strollable neighborhoods" and inhibiting car use downtown. I’m visiting New York City (my home town) as I write this, and I had forgotten how I lived here as if cars did not exist. I jettisoned city-wide by subway, bus and even a monorail in the air. In order to save itself from a traffic implosion, Austin is going to have to create an environment where public transportation is our #1 option. Bring back the Dillo. It can be our BART.
  • I truly enjoyed the presentation by Capital Metro on where the city is going with bus service and possible trolleys. I'd like to be on the commission that kicks the city into gear to get it done faster.
  • The presentation from Austin Community College about the Highland Campus had me at mini-city. I like the foresight ACC has and - in a city dominated by Mega U - it was cool to see the people’s educators not only creating a vision for accessibility to higher education, but in a space and environment that is suitable, green, and with greater purpose than just a building.
  • Those who understand the high cost of free parking share my enthusiasm for a walk-able, festival-ridden, true urban center. Their presentation on the history of parking space design was quirky and interesting and shows that prioritizing free parking not only costs a lot for the city, it does not incentivize other means of transportation.  

Difficult points for me:

  • The conversation about what development means in a city overall leads to some good reflection about the need for higher density as we grow so we do not continue to displace people and raise a cost of living already unaffordable to many. I understand this idea and I get its value, but it seemed clear to me that a privileged few would benefit.
  • Car sharing is a nice alternative for commuters, but it is clear that this alternative is not accessible to all - especially those who might really need it. At this time, the bottom line is: if you are "without papers," you're out of luck.
  • There was a lot of information about developing transportation to and from Hutto, but we have people, here, central to the city, still unable to get proper public transportation to work. Let’s start there then hit the affluent burbs. My ex from Mexico always wonders why we don’t use "Chivas" - the shorter, quicker buses in Latin America. We could have more frequent service with smaller vehicles. Just saying.

The closing speaker - Capital Metro President and CEO Linda Watson - kind of understated her "kick-ass-ness." I appreciate innovators like her who change a whole system. This is sometimes an impossible feat in a city bureaucracy, and I appreciate Leadership Austin for letting me hear her story.

Overall, I am going to turn lights off when not using them, consider solar power, look forward to faster bus service that I would be excited to take, and even maybe dream a little about what a subway would be like in Austin. I also take these sessions as opportunities to impart what I learn to the audience in which I serve - young, Latina, some impoverished, some not, but overall still not entirely in the city-wide dialogue.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

October 2012 ENGAGE - Politics from City to Nation

This morning was the first ENGAGE breakfast of the 2012-13 series, and we gathered on the Dell Hall Stage at the Long Center for the Performing Arts to discuss the upcoming election and its impact on Central Texas.

UPDATE I: Read a recap of the event from Community Impact News
UPDATE II: Watch KXAN's recap and coverage of the breakfast

October 2012 ENGAGE on stage at the Long Center

This breakfast was also a KXAN Town Hall, which was streamed live online and which will be broadcast on the KXAN network beginning at 7:00 pm Friday, October 19. We'll be updating this post with recaps and media coverage as it becomes available, but in the meantime we have the full audio podcast of the event below:


Don't forget! Election Day is November 6 and early voting in Travis County begins October 22. Take a look at the City of Austin's Charter Propositions page or the Austin League of Women Voters' ballot guide for a primer on the wide range of initiatives this election is covering.

Many thanks to our panel, moderators, sponsors and partners for a great event and what is sure to be another important and informative ENGAGE Breakfast Series. Join us for our next breakfast Wednesday, November 14 as we discuss Central Texas's growing veteran population and how our region is supporting them and their families.

We hope to see you there!

October 2012 ENGAGE Panelists and Moderators

  • Mike Clark-Madison - Vice President of Public Policy and Research, Hahn, Texas
  • Sheryl Cole - Councilmember and Mayor Pro Tem, City of Austin
  • Betty Dunkerley - Former Councilmember and Mayor Pro Tem, City of Austin
  • Regina Lawrence - Director, The Annette Strauss Institute for Civic Life
  • Terry Mitchell - President, Momark Development
  • Tom Pauken - Commissioner Representing Employers, Texas Workforce Commission
  • Ross Ramsey - Executive Director, The Texas Tribune
  • Jason Stanford - Founder and CEO, Stanford Campaigns
  • Moderated by KXAN-TV Anchors Robert Hadlock and Leslie Rhode

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

February 2012 Engage - Major Events and Their Impact

Compiled by Jeff Olmeda, Rick L'Amie and Marie-Claire Topper
-----

Austin has been bitten by the festival fever bug and we like it. That was the consensus of the interactive audience poll conducted during this morning's Engage breakfast - part of our ongoing ATXpansion series. The topic focused on major events (from SXSW to the ACL Music Festival and more) and their impact. Austin has become a destination for many top-drawing festivals and conferences that not only shape the city, but also reflect its character. What's more, 50 percent of attendees participating in the live poll said that Austin could use more major events for their economic and quality of life benefits.

February 2012 Engage Panelists (from left to right): Hugh Forrest, SXSW Interactive;
Jon Roberts, TIP Strategies; Lisa Hickey, C3 Presents; Geoff Moore, Circuit of
the Americas; and moderator Shannon Wolfson, KXAN News

UPDATE I: Some sample "soundbites" from our panelists:

  • Hugh Forest - Event Director, SXSW Interactive Festival
    SXSW generated $167 million in 2011. We actually increased badge prices for Interactive part to scare people away... but people still come to Interactive. People love a scarce commodity. This is what makes a festival successful. We try to incorporate the community by having free shows, and there are also "spinoff" events to be a part of the festival.
  • Jon Roberts - Principal, TIP Strategies
    We can sustain more events in Austin. That's what it means to be an international city. We are never disappointed in Austin. There is always something to do every night because we are international.
  • Lisa Hickey - Festival Marketing Director, C3 Presents
    ACL is successful because it infuses Austin's culture. Approximately 60 percent of attendees are from Austin, 23 percent are outside of Texas, and two percent are international. ACL has contributed around $4 million to local charity organizations.
  • Geoff Moore - Chief Sales Marketing Officer, Circuit of the Americas
    On opening day, F1 is expecting one third [of the attendees to come from] Texas, one-third from elsewhere in the U.S., and one third international. F1 is trying to build something great. The market determines the pricing.

You can listen to the full conversation in our podcast below, but we'd like to hear from you as well. Do you agree with the attendees who say Austin should have more events? Do the the economic and quality of life benefits outweigh the negatives addressed today such as traffic, lack of hotel space, and rising ticket prices? What thoughts or concerns do you have about festivals and their impact? Leave a comment below and let us know!

As always, many thanks to our presenting sponsor Capital One Bank and special thanks to our program partners - The Long Center for the Performing Arts, KXAN News, Sterling Affairs Catering and Events - and our mobile technology partner 44Doors.

UPDATE II:: Media and blog coverage of the breakfast:

References from the discussion:

Audio:


Live polling results:

Mouse over the pie charts below for more information on each of the responses.



Friday, January 27, 2012

January 2012 Essential Class - Transportation and Housing

Guest post from Essential Class of 2012 participant Amber Vasquez Bode. The January 2012 class day theme was "Transportation, Land Use, and Housing." 
-----

Austin City Council Member Chris Riley
Our housing and transportation day started off with a bang via Chris Riley. I came into his presentation curious because I live in Allandale, where the battle with Walmart went down a few years ago and he was a key player. His presentation advocated form based codes over traditional zoning, and he put forward a strong case by unveiling plans for a revamped Airport Blvd. corridor as well as a new Highland Mall area corridor. Of course, my classmates and I wanted to know about plans for other areas of town, since it seemed like the East side has been getting all of the love these days.

It sounded like there was a lot of unanimous community support in the areas that were currently on the radar, especially since the two mentioned in the presentation had nowhere to go but up. It makes sense, but is still a little disheartening for the rest of the run down corridors in need of makeovers in other areas.

Mike Clark-Madison followed with more discussion on land use and housing, examples of amazing results from form-based codes were shown and made me start wondering what was the opposition? It seemed to make so much sense- why not?

Lucy Galbraith tied it all together with an in-depth discussion on transportation planning. It was exciting to hear potential solutions to our chronic mobility crisis, but the challenge became clear to me, at least through discussion at my table. As we discussed bonds to pay for all of the new plans and allotting the extra tax revenue to pay for them, Lisa Fielder made the point that she has no interest in paying for projects on the other side of town from where she lived and already paid a fortune in taxes. We all felt the heat of high taxes, and the struggle with how our city gets from here to there came into focus. The transportation plans seemed awesome and ambitious, but still left me wanting even more solutions for the price tag.

The stakeholder engagement exercise we did after lunch was pretty enlightening, and certainly challenged a lot of assumptions I came in with as to who had the power and who was important in community debates. The following panel discussion highlighted some intriguing innovations from car sharing to building mini houses in peoples back yards. I couldn't help myself from asking the same question (again- I know) about why housing in central Austin seems to overlook larger families. The answer from Laurie Loew and Lisa Garcia was that large families need to stop thinking bigger is better and learn to live together in small spaces again, as they did with their respective huge families growing up. Fair enough.  Monica Williams at my table had a strong argument for packing it up and moving out of central Austin if I wanted more space. However, Lisa Fielder held her ground and made it clear that she had no intention of sharing space just because she lived central and felt no obligation to do so to allow more people to be central. All valid perspectives, I felt lucky to be around such informed people.

Amber Vasquez Bode is a Criminal Law Attorney with the Vasquez Law Firm in Austin, Texas.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Views from the Seats: October Engage

Feedback from attendees indicates the Oct. 6 Engage Breakfast was quite a success! A panel including Seton Family of Hospitals CEO Jesus Garza, UT President William Powers, and State Senator Kirk Watson addressed "ATXpansion: Central Texas Grows toward the Future."

Live polling took place throughout the event. By texting and tweeting responses, attendees helped to guide the discussion towards topics most relevant and pressing in our community. The results of the live polling are in our previous post.

The panelists discussed a variety of expansion-related issues -- from transportation, education and water conservation to healthcare and the establishment of a medical school in Austin. Here are few highlights of their comments:

Traffic and Transportation
The live audience poll indicated traffic and transportation is our region's top growth concern. Senator Kirk Watson agreed with the audience, saying that limited planning tools and a lack of sufficient funding are key issues. Said Watson, "You can’t vote 47% that transportation is your biggest problem, and then vote 47% that you don’t want to pay for it."

Medical School
Audience polling indicated that economic growth was the top benefit of creating a Medical School in Austin within 10 years. Jesus Garza stressed that beyond providing education for young medical students and residents and addressing a shortage in physicians, establishing a medical school would “be a great opportunity for us to really build the next economic equation for this region."

Bill Powers agreed, and pointed to the advantage of Austin already having the "underlying science and education" part of the necessary infrastructure. "All the elements are there," Powers said. "Biomedical engineering, chemistry and biochemistry, nursing, pharmacy, social work."

Each panelist concluded with a call to urging that in all areas of future growth, we should remember the importance of:
  • Building infrastructure for the next generation
  • Getting rid of “the fear factor” in order to encourage investment
  • Getting involved by becoming an expert in one’s passion
  • Approaching issues with pragmatism rather than political agenda

Popular Austin speaker and consultant Thom Singer was in the audience, and offers additional views and commentary on his blog, Some Assembly Required.

News Coverage
Be sure to visit the news coverage on our partner pages at Community Impact, and also click below to watch the coverage on KXAN. The Statesman also covered the story from the medical school perspective.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

October 2011 Engage - ATXpansion

We just wrapped up the first Engage breakfast of the 2011-12 series with Seton COO Jesus Garza, UT President William Powers, and Texas State Senator Kirk Watson on the Dell Hall Stage at the Long Center for the Performing Arts.


Community Impact Newspaper was there and has a great recap of the event. And don't forget to check out the references, audio podcast, and live polling results below. What did you think of the program? Leave a comment and let us know!

References from the discussion:

Audio:


Live polling results:



Friday, November 12, 2010

fastforward 2010 - Session III: The New Regionalism

Moderator Jon Roberts (TIP Strategies, Inc.) led the distinguished panel - Tom Mason (LCRA), Charles Heimsath (Capitol Market Research), Todd Hemingson (Capital Metro), Sean Compton (Congress for the New Urbanism), Jesus Garza (Seton Family of Hospitals), and Bill Glavin (TxDOT) - in an interesting look at regional planning issues that confront Central Texas governments, agencies, businesses, and non-profits as all emerge from the economic recession.

Session III Moderator John Roberts

Especially pertinent were discussions of ways to accomodate physical growth (both in terms of population and land consumption) in smart, enivronmentally sustainable, and socially equitable ways by making wise public and private investment in infrastructure and indeed all of the built environment.

References from the discussion:

Audio:
  • Part 1 of 2: Tom Mason, Charles Heimsath, Todd Hemingson, and Sean Compton
  • Part 2 of 2: Jesus Garza, Bill Glavin, and Q&A
Download these audio files: Part 1 | Part 2

Live polling results: